Parliament Gives Preliminary Approval to
Amnesty Law
On Wednesday 5 April the Parliament voted to give general approval
to the draft Amnesty and Pardon law. The Parliament will seek to
consider each article of the draft law on Monday 10 May 2004. JSMP
believes that the law, if it is not amended, will not assist reconciliation
and will lead to injustice.
Although many members of Parliament raised objections to the law
in discussions in the session, when the vote was called 24 voted
in favour and 18 against. Notably 14 parliamentarians abstained
from voting. Some of the objections raised by the Parliamentarians
were that the law was unconstitutional as the Parliament does not
have the power to grant pardons, which is a view shared by JSMP.
The Minister for Justice defended the law arguing that releasing
people from prison would show to the international community that
East Timor is ready to move forward with the process of reconciliation.
In JSMP’s view the law will not assist the process of reconciliation
as people who committed crimes in 1999 will still be liable for
prosecution. In addition the fact that the current draft law grants
pardons to all people in prison, including those who have been convicted
of Crimes Against Humanity may not be well received by the community
and may not assist reconciliation.
JSMP believes that the law will favour those that have access to
money and have committed economic crimes but will fail to achieve
reconciliation. Perhaps of greatest concern is the fact that the
law has been passed without any real consultation in the community.
It is clear to JSMP that there is very little public awareness of
the Amnesty Law. To pass a law which seeks to heal wounds in the
community and which has such important implications for the future
of Timor Leste would, in these circumstances, actually be harmful
to the prospects of reconciliation.
According to JSMP “ this law will have a significant impact
on communities perception of the formal justice system in East Timor
as certain classes of people will be immune for prosecution and
other set free from prison. It is therefore essential that this
law is not rushed through Parliament but due consideration is given
to community consulting and the Parliament has adequate time to
consider amendments to the law”