The Judicial System Monitoring Programme (JSMP) was set up in early 2001 in Dili, East Timor. Through court monitoring, the provision of legal analysis and thematic reports on the development of the judicial system, and outreach activities, JSMP aims to contribute to the ongoing evaluation and building of the justice system in East Timor. For more information, please email us at info@jsmp.minihub.org O Programa de Monitoramento do Sistema Judicial (JSMP) foi constituído no início de 2001 em Dili, Timor Leste. Através da monitorização do trabalho dos tribunais e da elaboração de análises legais e de relatórios temáticos sobre o desenvolvimento do sistema judicial, o JSMP espera poder contribuir para a avaliação contínua e para a construção do sistema de justiça em Timor Leste. Para informação adicional, email: info@jsmp.minihub.org Program Pemantauan Sistem Yudisial (JSMP) dibentuk pada awal tahun 2001 di Dili, Timor Leste. JSMP bertujuan untuk memberikan kontribusi terhadap kelangsungan pembangunan dan evaluasi sistem peradilan di Timor Leste melalui pemantauan pengadilan, penyediaan analisis hukum dan laporan-laporan tematis terhadap perkembangan system yudisial. Untuk informasi lebih lanjut, email: info@jsmp.minihub.org
HOME
ABOUT JSMP
NEWS
STAFF
DONORS
CONTACT
SEARCH
JSMP Information
Court Monitoring
SPSC Case Information
Resources

Last modified:
Friday 25 August, 2006 3:28 PM


New HRW on crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity

Human Rights Watch
ICTY: Tribunal Sets Valuable Precedent New Book Organizes Yugoslav Tribunal’s Decisions by Subject
July 27, 2006


(New York, July 27, 2006) – The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia has made precedent-setting decisions on genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, Human Rights Watch said today as it released a comprehensive book that organizes the decisions of that tribunal by topic.

“The case law organized in this volume is a legacy that will provide guidance for future generations,” said Jennifer Trahan, of counsel to Human Rights Watch’s International Justice Program. “The tribunal’s work has been immensely important in holding perpetrators of heinous crimes accountable and sending the message that serious crimes will not go unpunished.” 
 
The Yugoslav tribunal has played a critical role in determining responsibility for the horrific crimes that occurred in the Balkan conflicts during the 1990s, Human Rights Watch said. The tribunal suffered a setback with the death of Slobodan Milosevic and the abrupt end of his four-year trial. Just recently, however, the Yugoslav tribunal has begun important trials involving senior officials accused of crimes including genocide committed at Srebrenica, and war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Kosovo. 
 
The 861-page book from Human Rights Watch organizes the tribunal’s decisions by topic, including war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, command responsibility, sentences, fair trial rights and guilty pleas. 
 
“This book makes the important decisions of the tribunal uniquely accessible because it organizes the law by subject in one volume,” said Trahan. 

The book applies the law to the facts of selected cases covering atrocities such as the Srebrenica massacre (where approximately 7,000 unarmed men and boys were executed by Bosnian-Serb forces), the siege of Sarajevo, and brutalities perpetrated in camps such as the infamous “Omarska camp” in Bosnia-Herzegovina. 
 
The volume, which is available online http://hrw.org/reports/2006/icty0706/ and in print http://hrwpubs.stores.yahoo.net/2006reports.html,  is oriented to practitioners and staff at institutions established to try such crimes – such as the International Criminal Court and the Sierra Leone Special Court. The book will also serve as a tool for academics, nongovernmental organizations working in the field, and students interested in international criminal justice, Human Rights Watch said. 
 
Human Rights Watch’s original version of the book, http://hrw.org/reports/2004/ij/, which covered both Yugoslav and Rwandan tribunal law, was well-received by officials of international and “hybrid” criminal tribunals.

END

Copy Right: JSMP-DIli, June 2004