|
Judicial System Monitoring Programme (JSMP)
Press Release
Dili, 14 January 2005
The Indonesia-
East Timor 'Truth and Friendship Commission': More Friendship, Less
Truth, Impunity from the Law
It was announced
on 21 December 2004 that the governments of East Timor and Indonesia
had agreed on the formation of a Truth and Friendship Commission
to look into the Referendum-related violence which took place in
East Timor in 1999, however, the precise details as to how this
will be achieved remain unclear. What is clear in JSMP's view is
that the individuals who are primarily responsible for the brutal
crimes perpetrated against the Timorese people will be neither identified
nor held to account by the Commission for their actions in orchestrating
the destruction of East Timor.
As
Jose Ramos-Horta, Foreign Minister for East Timor, has said, the
work of the Commission "would finally close this chapter. We
would hope and intend that this initiative would resolve once and
for all the events of 1999".
JSMP has been informed by the East Timor Ministry of Foreign Affairs
that the powers and mandate of the Commission will be determined
by the end of this month when the terms of reference are agreed
upon by the governments of East Timor and Indonesia.
The
Jakarta trials are widely regarded, both by international NGO's
and governments (including that of the US) as a whitewash. The fact
that four of the total six convictions issued by the Jakarta Court
have been overturned
on appeal and that the remaining two are pending appeal indicates
that this process was neither independent nor impartial.
The
UN Tribunal in Dili has to date convicted 72 persons of offences
committed in 1999, however, nearly all convictions were of low level
Timorese functionaries. The senior military officers who have been
indicted,
and who are alleged to bear principal responsibility for the violence,
remain in Indonesia, shielded behind a wall of impunity.
Whatever
the standard of the Jakarta and Dili trials, it is clear that they
have failed to meet the UN demands made in Security Council Resolution
1272 that "all those responsible for such violence be brought
to justice".
The
failure to bring the principal perpetrators to justice has brought
calls from prominent international NGO's and governments for the
UN to investigate the quality of the trials. Kofi Annan, with the
support of a number of major
member states, is now spearheading UN efforts to establish a Commission
of Experts ("COE") which will assess whether these trials
were impartial and in accordance with standards of international
law. If the COE is established and finds that the trials fall short
of these standards, the international community has a duty to ensure
the perpetrators are tried before a tribunal which does accord with
international standards.
The
fact that the Truth Commission proposal was announced at a time
when steps are being taken to establish the COE is no coincidence
- it has been openly acknowledged by both governments that the Commission
is intended to block the progress of the COE initiative. East Timor's
eagerness to halt further investigation of 1999-related violence
is explained by its well-publicised desire to prioritise good relations
with its neighbour. It is for this reason, amongst others, that
crimes committed against humanity are a matter of concern for the
entire international community. They cannot be ignored or disposed
of as a matter of bilateral political concern.
The
intended role of the Commission and the spirit in which it was agreed
upon are perhaps best summed up by its chosen title, 'The Truth
and Friendship Commission'. The need to denounce impunity and to
bring to justice those responsible for 24 years of brutality must
not be sacrificed on the altar of political friendship on which
the proposed Commission is based.
End |