![]() |
![]() |
Last
modified: |
Thirty-year
wait for justice for Timor Leste Opinion and Editorial - December 10, 2005
This week marks the
30th anniversary of the Indonesian invasion of East Timor, with the people
of East Timor organizing different activities to commemorate this historic
moment. There was a public debate on justice for victims, a long march
in the capital, the launching of a documentary film and the laying of
wreaths and flowers Thirty years ago on
Dec. 7, bombs, gunfire and troops rained down on this backwater capital
of the former Portuguese colony of East Timor. The Indonesian invasion
led to untold casualties, killings, rapes and The invasion and subsequent occupation was supported by Indonesia's powerful allies, mostly western countries, including Australia and Britain. Then U.S. president Gerald Ford and his secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, signaled their approval while in Jakarta a day before the invasion. Today, Saddam Hussein is on trial in Iraq and perpetrators of crimes against humanity in several countries have been brought before the UN's ad hoc tribunals. Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court are investigating the leaders of the Ugandan rebel group the Lord's Resistance Army. Meanwhile, the Indonesian generals who organized and committed serious crimes against humanity in East Timor remain free. Why should there be such discrimination in the implementation of justice? On Nov. 12, 1991, the
world awakened to the plight of East Timor, when hundreds of unarmed East
Timorese students were gunned down by the Indonesian military during a
peaceful protest at Santa Cruz cemetery Like the Santa Cruz
massacre, many of the crimes committed by the Indonesia military during
its occupation of East Timor are well-documented. A recent report by the
UN Commission of Experts (COE) made a strong case for an international
role in prosecuting the crimes against the people of East Timor. The COE
report was released at a time when, unfortunately, the UN seems unwilling
to take concerted action to bring to justice key perpetrators. It would
be regrettable if the very robust recommendations of the COE -- including
its call to Meanwhile, the governments of East Timor and Indonesia have conspired to bypass the whole issue of justice. Their joint Truth and Friendship Commission has been strongly criticized as more likely to bury the issue and pave the way for impunity. By contrast, East Timor's Commission for Reception, Truth and Reconciliation (CAVR), a body established by the UN three years ago, recently handed over its report. It contains strong recommendations pertaining to justice and reparations for victims. Faced with the CAVR
report, the president of East Timor, Xanana Gusmao, first expressed his
strong objection to the recommendations. The president is now arguing
that the report, especially its recommendations, could harm the relationship
with the Indonesian government. He has cited one recommendation, that
the international Progress toward justice
lies squarely in the hands of the UN. But as it has shown repeatedly,
the UN acts slowly in responding to crises of humanity, whether in attempting
to prevent them or to punish people after the fact. However, fighting
against impunity, as enshrined in its various international documents,
remains one of the main goals of the UN. Why is it that Saddam Hussein
can be tried, Milosevic can be tried, the International Criminal Court
at the Hague is now indicting the leaders of the Lord's Resistance Army
and perhaps other leaders The UN must take prompt
action to bring these Indonesian perpetrators to justice. Otherwise, the
Indonesian government will face an insurmountable barrier in rebuilding
the rule of law and establishing democracy in its own country. Continued
impunity could also lead to border incursions into East Timor by rogue
Indonesian military The writer, a human
rights lawyer, lecturer and former member of East Timor's National Parliament,
is based in Dili, East Timor. END |
|
Copy Right: JSMP-DIli,
June 2004
|