|
KAIROS: Canadian Ecumenical Justice
Initiatives Ending Impunity and Defending Human Rights in Timor
Leste and Indonesia
KAIROS Submission to the FAC-NGO Annual Human Rights Consultations
in preparation for 61st Session of the UNCHR
14 March- 22 April 2005
KAIROS is
gravely concerned about the lack of accountability for the serious
crimes committed against the people of Timor Leste, and the long-standing
problems of impunity and gross human rights violations
committed by security forces in Indonesia, particularly in the province
of Aceh. The following provides an overview of these critical issues
and recommendations for Canadian government action at UNCHR 61.
Contents of this brief:
* Justice for
the People of Timor Leste
* Serious Crimes Process in Timor Leste
* Ad Hoc Human Rights Tribunal in Indonesia
* International Responsibility to ensure Justice
* Recommendations: Timor Leste
* Ending Impunity and Human Rights Abuses in Indonesia
o Aceh
o The Need for UNCHR Special Procedures in Indonesia
* Recommendations: Indonesia
Justice for the
People of Timor Leste
The judicial
processes related to the 1999 violence in Timor Leste have failed
to meet the Timorese people's need and desire for justice. Despite
well-documented evidence, not a single Indonesian civil or security
official responsible for the atrocities has been held accountable
for their actions. In fact, the vast majority of those who have
been accused of committing serious crimes against the people of
Timor Leste continue to enjoy impunity.
Serious Crimes
Process in Timor Leste
The UN High Commissioner
for Human Rights December 2004 report on the human rights situation
in Timor Leste concluded that, "...jurisdictional limitations
and the time frame established by the Security Council has
limited [the Serious Crimes process'] ability to fully meet Timorese
aspirations for justice." (E/CN.4/2005/115)
Indonesia has
refused to extradite those whom the Serious Crimes Unit (SCU) has
indicted, and because the court's jurisdiction is limited to Timor
Leste, prosecution of several hundred cases has not been possible.
The case of retired General Wiranto highlights this critical problem:
In February 2003, the SCU filed an indictment of crimes against
humanity against Wiranto and then issued an arrest warrant for him
in May 2004. Although
prosecutors said that all countries had an obligation to detain
the ex-general, Indonesia insisted that it would not recognize the
jurisdiction of the tribunal and refused to respect the arrest warrant.
Wiranto enjoys impunity to such a great extent that he was nominated
by Indonesia's traditional ruling-party, and ran as one of the top
candidates in the 2004 presidential elections.
Ad Hoc Human
Rights Tribunal in Indonesia
By all accounts,
including that of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the
outcome of Indonesia's Ad Hoc Human Rights Tribunal is extremely
disappointing. All but one conviction has been overturned, including
that of the highest ranking military commander. The only person
convicted is Eurico Guterres, an ethnic Timorese who remains free
pending the Supreme Court's decision on his appeal. No other indictments
have been issued.
There has clearly
been no genuine effort to punish perpetrators or maintain minimum
standards of independence and impartiality. Human Rights Watch (2004)
has reported political interference in the Ad Hoc tribunal process,
commenting that the Indonesian military still wields enormous influence
over the judiciary. Impunity is a deeply rooted problem in Indonesia,
and as recommended by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights,
"Attention must continue to be paid in the national context
to the dialogue concerning justice and accountability." (E/CN.4/2005/115)
International
Responsibility to ensure Justice
The UN and its
member states have a particular obligation to ensure justice for
the victims of the crimes committed in Timor Leste. This special
responsibility has been affirmed by the International Commission
of
Inquiry, the demands of UN Security Council Resolution 1272, and
the UNCHR resolution on East Timor adopted in September 1999. Subsequently
several UNCHR Chairperson's statements have reminded the international
community of this responsibility,
In December 2004,
the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights commented that, "It
is positive that Security Council members and more generally, the
international governmental and NGO community have stressed the importance
of providing accountability for the events of 1999.[and] the Secretary
General has also stated his commitment to look at options for accountability."
(E/CN.4/2005/115)
Kofi Annan's
proposal to create a Commission of Experts (COE) to assess the technical
and political obstacles to achieving justice for East Timor is a
concrete step in the direction of achieving justice. KAIROS partners
and human rights organizations in Indonesia support the COE and
call on Indonesia and Timor Leste to cooperate with this review
process as part of their commitment to end impunity. There is strong
opposition by civil society groups in Indonesia and Timor Leste
to the Truth and Friendship Commission (TFC) proposed by their two
governments (see attached statement by KAIROS partners). The TFC
is viewed as a disingenuous and illegitimate initiative that will
not achieve justice and accountability.
Recommendations:
Canada should
advocate for a UNCHR 61 Chairperson's statement on Timor Leste that:
1. expresses
the UNCHR's great disappointment with the demonstrated inability
of both Indonesian and Timor Leste judicial processes to deliver
justice for the Timorese victims of the 1999 violence;
2. reiterates
the special responsibility of the UN and its member states to ensure
justice for the Timorese and repeats the UNCHR 60's call for the
international community "to lend its support to the fight against
impunity";
3. calls for
international support of the UN Secretary General's initiative to
create an International Commission of Experts (COE) to review the
status of efforts undertaken in the region and to hold individuals
accountable for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed
in Timor Leste; and
4. requests
the international community's financial help for continued technical
assistance to build the capacity and ensure the sustainability of
governmental and civil society institutions mandated to protect
and promote
human rights in Timor Leste.
In its interventions
at UNCHR 61 and bilateral meetings, Canada should press Indonesia
to:
1. cooperate
fully with any review of its Ad Hoc Human Rights Tribunal for East
Timor which may be undertaken by the UN, such as the proposed Commission
of Experts;
2. comply with
UNCHR resolutions passed in previous years that relate to justice
for the victims of the human rights violations committed in Timor-Leste
in 1999 ; and
3. cooperate
fully with the Serious Crimes process in Timor-Leste by entering
into extradition and mutual legal assistance agreements.
Ending Impunity
and Human Rights Abuses in Indonesia
As Professor
Geoffrey Robinson, director of the Centre for Southeast Asian Studies
at UCLA asserts, the question of justice for the East Timorese has".consequences
for Indonesia. The failure to punish those who were responsible
for these crimes perpetuates a cycle of disrespect for justice.
If these well-documented crimes in East Timor go unpunished, nothing
need be punished." (Speech delivered at UCLA, May, 2004)
The Indonesian
legal system has already proven itself incapable of holding perpetrators
of human rights violations and crimes against humanity to account.
Consequently, these individuals, many of whom are from the military,
continue to commit abuses with impunity and hold positions of great
influence and power.
Until the persistent
and deeply rooted problems of impunity and militarism are properly
addressed, the human rights situation in Indonesia, and especially
in Aceh, will remain critical.
Aceh
There continues
to be widespread human rights violations in Aceh as a result of
the largest military operation since the invasion of East Timor
in 1975. Although the region is experiencing a humanitarian crisis
in the
wake of the December 26, 2004 tsunami-earthquake disaster, military
operations and violence against the civilian population continue.In
May 2003, martial law was imposed on Aceh and approximately 40,000
troops were deployed to the province. Although martial law was downgraded
to a state of civil emergency one year later, military operations
continued to result in widespread human rights violations including,
extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, arbitrary arrests,
torture and rape. There were approximately 2,000 casualties during
the period between May 2003-December 2004, and according to military
reports, an additional 200
have been killed in combat operations since the tsunami hit the
region.Violence
against civilians
While the military
claims that most past and current casualties are separatist fighters
(GAM), Indonesian and international human right groups, including
the government's own human rights commission, assert that most of
the dead and victims of abuse are civilians. KAIROS partners and
human rights organizations have documented evidence that the military
often does not distinguish between GAM members and non-combatants.
Their investigations have also shown that while the GAM is also
guilty of atrocities, the majority of human rights violations against
the civilian population are committed by Indonesian security forces.
The military
has publicly acknowledged that troops in Aceh are guilty of hundreds
of violations, but there has been no accountability for abuses such
as the torture and killing of civilians. The military continues
to
operate with impunity; and KAIROS partners and several other human
rights organizations continue to report serious abuses against innocent
civilians.
Human Rights
Defenders
KAIROS partners
and other human rights defenders have been targeted and subject
to abuse by the military as well. With the imposition of martial
law, civil liberties were curtailed, internationals and foreign
media were
banned from Aceh, and many non-governmental organizations, students
and politicians were labeled and subsequently targeted as GAM sympathizers.
Human rights organizations, such as one of KAIROS' partners, suffered
violent persecution and were driven out of the province or forced
underground. Despite these difficult circumstances, our partner
and other groups continue to monitor and report human rights violations.
Even human rights
defenders who work outside of this war-torn province have been targeted
for their criticism of the military's role in Aceh and elsewhere
in the country. In June 2004, Sidney Jones of the International
Crisis Group was expulsed from Indonesia, and in September, Indonesia's
pre-eminent human rights defender, Munir, was tragically killed.
No one has been arrested in connection with Munir's murder, and
there is criticism of the government's ongoing investigation.
The Need for
UNCHR Special Procedures in Indonesia
The grave human
rights situation in Indonesia clearly deserves international scrutiny
and accountability within multilateral processes. Toward this end,
the Special Procedures of the UNCHR should be allowed to
investigate, monitor and publicly report on the human rights situation
in the country.
While some Special
Procedures have been permitted in Indonesia, the government has
declined to issue invitations to others despite repeated requests.
The Special Rapporteur on torture, and the Special Representative
of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders have not been
welcomed to the country, and no special procedure has been allowed
in either Aceh or Papua. The Special Rapporteurs on torture and
on violence against women have specifically requested visits to
these conflict-ridden regions.
With the Indonesian
Ambassador's recent appointment as chair of the UNCHR, it is incumbent
on his country to demonstrate its commitment to the international
promotion and protection of human rights. At a minimum,
Indonesia should support the role of the UNCHR and its Special Procedures
in pursuing these goals.
Recommendations
In its Item 9
speech and all its interventions at UNCHR 61, Canada should:
1. express grave
concern about serious human rights abuses and impunity in Indonesia,
particularly in Aceh where ongoing military operations have resulted
in gross human rights violations against the civilian population;
and
2. press Indonesia
to extend a standing invitation to the Special Procedures of the
Commission and to co-operate with their requests to undertake visits
to all parts of the country, especially Aceh and Papua.
In its engagement
on human rights issues with Indonesia in the future, Canada should
1. reconsider
the effectiveness and suitability of its bilateral human rights
dialogue with Indonesia. The country's critical human rights situation
and persistent problems of impunity and militarism merit international
scrutiny in multilateral fora such as the UNCHR.
2. consider
sponsoring a resolution on Indonesia at UNCHR 62.
Page URL: www.kairoscanada.org/e/humanrights/endingImpunityTimorLeste.asp
KAIROS
Canadian Ecumenical Justice Initiatives
129 St. Clair Ave. West . Toronto, ON . Canada . M4V 1N5
Tel: 416-463-5312 | Toll-free: 1-877-403-8933| Fax: 416-463-5569
E-mail: info@kairoscanada.org
End |