|
Judicial
System Monitoring Programme
JSMP
Press
Release,
24 May
2005.
Judge
Sentences Defendant to Six Years Imprisonment in Rape Case
On Thursday
19 May 2005 an international judge of the Dili District Court sentenced
a defendant to six years imprisonment in a rape case. The indictment
charged the defendant with the offence of rape under Article 285
of the Indonesian Penal Code which carries a maximum sentence of
12 years imprisonment.
The
judge decided that the evidence presented in the case proved that
the defendant had has forced sexual intercourse with the victim.
The victim is the daughter of the defendant. The victim is married
and has two children to her husband who still lives in West Timor
as a refugee.
The
judge found that the defendant raped the victim on five occasions,
and had impregnated the victim as a result of the rape. The child
born of the rape had since died. The victim is still suffering from
illness and trauma as a consequence of the defendant’s actions.
When
the defendant raped the victim he threatened that he would kill
his two grandchildren if the victim did not allow him to have sexual
intercourse with her. The victim feared this threat and was forced
to have sex with her father on five occasions. When the victim was
eight months pregnant she informed her mother, who is the wife of
the defendant, what had happened.
The
judge stated that the court could hand down a maximum sentence of
twelve years as the defendant had been found guilty based on conclusive
evidence. However the court also took into account differences in
the testimony of the victim and the defendant and the prior record
of the defendant. The judge then decided to sentence the accused
to six years imprisonment.
JSMP
welcomes the six year imprisonment penalty handed down by the judge
in this case. Compared with penalties delivered for other serious
sexual assault offences discussed in JSMP’s report “Analysis
of Decisions in Cases involving Women and Children Victims: June
2004 – March 2005” this is one of the harsher penalties
to date, and in our view reflects the seriousness of the offence
committed. However, we would again like to remind the court that
in cases involving sexual violence carried out by a close family
member there is a gross breach of trust, and consequently, the maximum
sentence for the offence (Article 285 carries a maximum sentence
of twelve years) should always be considered.
END
|